Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
Abstract
The joining of two channels, tubes, fibers, or other network components is known as an anastomosis. “Anastomoun” (provide with a mouth) is the Greek word from which the word originated in the late 16th century. An analytical study that was non‐randomized, prospective, interventional, and hospital‐based was conducted at Burdwan Medical College and Hospital. The study population consisted of patients aged 13‐60 who met the eligibility requirements and underwent small bowel anastomosis in an emergency or elective setting during the study period. The research was carried out from January 2018 to June 2019. This study included 50 patients in total. Three techniques were used to construct the anastomosis stapler method (n3 = 10), double layer (n2 = 20), and single layer (n1 = 20). The data that follows has been examined in light of the conclusions reached by these three groups. The same three study groups experienced wound dehiscence. The chi‐square test (p>0.776) unequivocally demonstrated that there isn’t a statistically significant difference. The stapler group did not experience intestinal fistulas, despite the same number of wound dehiscence. However, the difference (p>0.513) does not indicate statistical significance. In the double layer group, wound infection is significantly higher (p>0.002) than in the single layer group. Between the three distinct research groups, there is no statistically significant difference in the mean hospital stay (p>0.512). The earliest discharge was granted to all three groups after five days. The small sample size of this study and the unavailability of staplers in emergency OT make it impossible to draw any clear conclusions. Further investigation is needed for some interference.
How to cite this article:
Kaushik Mandal and Mohan Kumar Das. A Comparative Study on Small Bowel Anastomosis Regarding Anastomotic Techniques and Post‐
Operative Outcomes.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.59218/makrjms.2024.5.1.3
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.59218/makrjms.2024.5.1.3