Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
Abstract
The surgical treatment of inguinal hernias has evolved through several stages to reach a modern and successful era. Despite the frequency of this procedure, no surgeon has ideal results and complications to challenge surgeons. To compare the results of Desarda’s tissue repair with Lichtenstein hernia repair for inguinal hernia. METHOD: Study conducted on 50 patients aged between 21‐82 years at Government medical college Kota for 27 months between October 2019 and Dec 2021. Patients Aged 18 and above, with a primary, reducible, irreducible and obstructed inguinal or inguino‐scrotal hernia and who consented to participate in the study were taken. Age of the patients ranged between 21 years to 82 years with mean age 44.78±15.68 years, hernia was more common on right side i.e. 64% whereas 4% were bilateral. Repair time in mesh group was 14‐19 min, whereas 11‐18 min. in non mesh group (p<0.05). There was no significant statistical difference in mean pain scores at five points of time between the two intervention groups (p>0.05). This study has shown that the efficacy of Desarda’s technique in respect of influencing the short‐term outcomes of hernia repair is comparable to those of Lichtenstein method. It is wise to recommend Desarda’s tissue repair as a reasonable option to Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.
How to cite this article:
Neetu Singh, Gaurav Sharma, Sonali Alla and Sanjay Lodha. Comparision of Desarda’s Tissue Repair with Lichtenstein Hernia Repair for Inguinal Hernia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.59218/makrjms.2023.8.126.129
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.59218/makrjms.2023.8.126.129