Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Early detection is crucial for improving outcomes, and imaging modalities like mammography and ultrasound play a significant role in screening and diagnosis. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound versus mammography in detecting breast lesions in women aged 40‐60. This cross‐sectional study was conducted on 200 women aged 40‐60 who presented with breast‐related symptoms or were undergoing routine screening. Both ultrasound and mammography were performed on each participant. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of both modalities were compared, with histopathological findings serving as the reference standard. The results of the study indicate that ultrasound is more sensitive in detecting certain types of breast lesions, particularly in women with dense breast tissue, while mammography showed higher specificity. However, the combined use of both modalities enhanced diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound and mammography each have distinct strengths in breast lesion detection. The findings suggest that a combined approach may be optimal for improving diagnostic accuracy, particularly in women with dense breast tissue.
How to cite this article:
Rajkuvar Dilip Koparde, Saurabh Dembla and Ayushi Khawas. Assessment of Ultrasound Versus Mammography in Detecting Breast Lesions in Women Aged 40‐60:
A Cross‐Sectional Study.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.36478/makrjms.2024.9.289.293
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.36478/makrjms.2024.9.289.293