Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
Abstract
Appendectomy is a standard procedure for treating appendicitis, with choices between minimally invasive and traditional open techniques. This study compares the effectiveness and outcomes of these two surgical methods. A total of 140 patients diagnosed with appendicitis were randomized into two groups: those undergoing minimally invasive appendectomy (n=70) and those undergoing traditional open appendectomy (n=70). Data were collected on operative time, recovery rate, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Minimally invasive appendectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain and fewer complications compared to traditional open appendectomy. However, the operative time was slightly longer in the minimally invasive group. Minimally invasive appendectomy offers significant advantages over the traditional open technique in terms of recovery and postoperative outcomes, suggesting it should be considered the preferred approach for appendicitis when feasible.
How to cite this article:
K.B. Tejaswi, P. Venkata Ramana Reddy and Mali Nishikanth. Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs. Traditional Open Appendectomy Techniques: A Comparative Study.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.36478/makrjms.2023.12.584.588
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.36478/makrjms.2023.12.584.588