Gokhan Dogruer, Mustafa Kemal Saribay, Fikret Karaca and Yasar Ergun
Page: 809-813 | Received 21 Sep 2022, Published online: 21 Sep 2022
Full Text Reference XML File PDF File
This study was carried out to compare the pregnancy rates in timed artificial inseminations after Ovsynch and PGF2α + GnRH applications on lactating dairy cows. The research was conducted in a commercial dairy farm on 84 lactating Holstein cows which the ages were ranging between 3-5 years old and between 80-120 days postpartum. The cows were randomly assigned to two groups as Ovsynch (n = 42) and Prosta Glandin (PG) (n = 42). The cows in Ovsynch group recieved 10.5 μg-1 GnRH at day 0, 500 μg-1 PGF2α at day 7 and 10.5 μg-1 GnRH at day 9 intramuscularly. The cows in PG group recieved 500 μg-1 PGF2α two times with an interval of 14 days and 10.5 μg-1 GnRH intramuscularly 48 h after the second PGF2α injection. Artificial inseminations were applied to the cows in both of the groups between 16-20 h after the GnRH injections. The pregnancy diagnosis was performed 30 days after the artificial inseminations by ultrasonography. The pregnancy rates were determined as 35.7% (15/42) in Ovsynch group and 47.6% (20/42) in PG group. Although, the pregnancy rate were higher in PG group than the Ovsynch group the differrence was not statistically important (p>0.05). It was concluded that the programme consisted of 14 days interval double dose PGF2α injections, GnRH applications 48 h following the second PGF2α injection and timed artificial insemination 16-20 h after the GnRH injection could be an alternative to the Ovsynch programme in timed artificial inseminations.
INTRODUCTION
Fertility is an important factor for production and profitability in dairy herds. Having a calf per year is the main target in cow breeding. For achieving this target, the estrous should be correctly detected and the cows should become pregnant before 85 days postpartum. Studies suggest that although, the cows has regular estrous cycles the rate of correct estrous detection in cows are <50%, so this causes the extension of calving interval (Larson and Ball, 1992; Jainudeen and Hafez, 2000; Kim et al., 2005). By using the systematic reproductive programmes fertility could be improved. The systematic reproductive programmes enables to fix-time insemination by synchronizing the estrous or ovulations in large numbers of cows at desired periods without detecting estrous (Kim et al., 2005; Nak et al., 2005). The advantages of the fixed-time artificial insemination programmes combined with ovulation and estrous synchronization are reported as abating the estrous detection problem, decreasing the days open till conception and maintaining the conception rates in economic limits (Lean et al., 2003; Perry et al., 2004) Although, the problem for undetected estrous is solved by fixed-time inseminations, it increases the risk of inseminating cows, which are not in estrous (Tenhagen et al., 2000). Other problems associated with the Ovsynch protocol are the interval variation between the GnRH injection and ovulation (Patterson et al., 2003), the loss of functional dominance of the follicle, less ovulatory capacity of the dominant follicle and the cows in standing estrous prior to prostaglandin injections (Vasconcelos et al., 1999; Perry et al., 2004).
The Ovsynch protocol includes the GnRH administration at a random stage of the estrous cycle. GnRH provokes the LH release also ovulates or luteinizes the the dominant follicle and starts a new follicular wave in 2-3 days. The new luteal tissue is regressed by the PGF2α, which is applied at day 7. The GnRH injected at day 9 provokes the ovulation of the dominant follicle formed in the new follicular wave (Vasconcelos et al., 1999). The ovulations in the Ovsynch procedure occur 24-32 h following the second GnRH administrations (Pursley et al., 1997a; Stevenson et al., 1999).
The PGF2α administrations cause the regression of the fuctional Corpus Luteum (CL). Owing to the regression of CL the blood progesterone concentration rapidly decreases and a significant rise in the estrogen causes an increase in the LH surge and ovulation (King et al., 1982; Diskin et al., 2002; Yaniz et al., 2004). While one dose regimen of the PGF2α is used in the luteal phase (6-16 days) of the cycle, 11-14 days apart injection is advised to be used in the unknown stage of the cycle in large herds (Yaniz et al., 2004; Momcilovic et al., 1998; Cavalieri et al., 2006). After the last application of the PGF2α, the estrous initiation varies 39-80 h in the heifers, 48-76 h in cows (Le Blanc et al., 1998). Cavalieri et al. (2006) states that this large variation in estrous initiation time requires a labour and time for artificial inseminations. Le Blanc et al. (1998) reports that GnRH injections following the PGF2α applications ensures providence in labour and time for artificial inseminations.
This research was carried out to compare the pregnancy rates in timed artificial inseminations after Ovsynch and double dose PGF2α + GnRH applications on lactating dairy cows.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was carried out at a commercial dairy cow farm in Hatay in Turkey. The research material consisted of 84 holstein cows, which the ages ranged between 3-5 and were between the intervals of 80-120 days postpartum. All cows were housed in free stall barns with free access to feed and water.
The cows were milked twice a day and the daily milk yield of the trial group cows varied between 20-35 litres/cow during the experiments.
The cows were randomly assigned to two groups as Ovsynch and Prosta Glandin (PG). The cows in Ovsynch group (n = 42) recieved 10.5 μg GnRH (Buserelin acetate, Receptal, Intervet, Turkey) at day 0, 500 μg PGF2α (Cloprostenol, Juramat, Ege-Vet, Turkey) at day 7 and 10.5 μg GnRH at day 9 intramuscularly. The cows in PG group (n = 42) recieved 500 μg PGF2α two times with an 14 days interval and 10 μg GnRH intramuscularly 48 h after the second PGF2α injection.
Rectal palpation was carried out in the cows both in Ovsych and PG group before the PGF2α injections to control the luteal structures. According to the rectal palpation results fully formed and regressed corpus luteums were recorded. Estrous detection was performed 3 times a day for 45 min at the interval of PGF2a-GnRH injection period and the cows which showed estrous was recorded. Timed artificial insemination was applied to the cows in both of the groups 16-20 h after the GnRH injections.
The pregnancy diagnosis was carried out 30 days after the artificial inseminations by a real time B-mode 6-8 MHz rectal probe ultrasound equipment (Pie medical falco Scanner 100 LDC, VET). The X2 test in SPSS 14.00 programme was used in the comparison of the pregnancy rates obtained in the Ovsynch and PG groups.
RESULTS AND DISSCUSION
The rectal ovarial findings at the time of PGF2a injection and the estrous detection results at the interval of PGF2a-GnRH injection period are summarized at Table 1. The artificial inseminations and conception rates are shown at Table 2.
Prior to the PGF2α injection, while 4 regressed and 38 fully formed corpus luteum were detected in the Ovsynch group, all CL were fully formed in the PG group. A total of 6 cows, (14.3%), together with the 4 cows having regressed CL showed estrous at the interval of PGF2a-GnRH injection period in the Ovsynch group. No estrous symptom were detected in the PG group at the interval of PGF2a-GnRH injection period.
The pregnancy rates were 35.7% (15/42) and 47.6% (20/42) in the Ovsynch and PG groups respectively. The difference in the pregnancy rates among the groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Systematic fertility programmes are widely used in cattle production without the need for estrous detection. Two effective protocols including GnRH-PGF2α-GnRH combination (Ovsynch) and a series of PGF2α applications followed by a timed artificial insemination are preferred (Nebel and Jobst, 1998).
Table 1: | Rectal palpation before the PGF2a administration and estrous detection results at the interval of PGF2a-GnRH injection period in the ovsynch and PG gropus |
![]() |
|
aRectal palpation prior to PGF2a injection; bEstrous detection at the interval of PGF2a-GnRH injection period |
Table 2: | The artificial insemination and conception rates in the Ovsynch and PG groups |
![]() |
Recently, it is outlined that the ovulation synchronization by the Ovsynch protocol resulted in a better conception rates than the PGF2α based estrous synchronization protocols (Pursley et al., 1997a, b). However, the reason for the variation in the response of the cows and heifers in Ovsynch protocol is informed to be arised from the time variations of the second GnRH injection and ovulation interval (Patterson et al., 2003). Important problems in Ovsynch protocol are suggested as the loss of functional dominance in the dominant follicle prior to second GnRH treatment and a follicle in the newly emerging follicular wave which had not yet acquired ovulatory capacity. Also the 15% of the cows which are in standing estrous prior to or at the prostaglandin injection time is pointed out to be another disadvantage in Ovsynch procedure (Vasconcelos et al., 1999; Perry et al., 2004). The probability of stimulating ovulation during Ovsynch programme in lactating cows is mentioned to be 85% and the synchronization of ovulation is reported as 87-100% (Pursley et al., 1997a). Santos et al. (2004) stated that asynchnory was determined in 13-16% of the cows in Ovsynch programme. In the present study prior to the PGF2α injection, 4 regressed corpus luteum were detected, together with the 4 cows having regressed CL, 6 cows (14.3%) were standing estrous at the interval of PGF2α-GnRH injection period in the Ovsynch group. However, no estrous symptom were detected in the PG group at the interval of PGF2α-GnRH injection period. If the Ovsynch program has been initiated in the late phase of the oestrous cycle (such as day 15) at the time of prostaglandin injection (day 7), the CL has already been regressed and the cow may even be in standing estrous (Moreira et al ., 2000). This result indicates that double dose PGF2α + GnRH programme may extinguish the disadvantages of the Ovsynch procedure mentioned above.
The conception rates in the Ovsynch studies carried out on lactating cows varied from 28.3-42.4% (Moreira et al., 2000; Cartmill et al., 2001; Williams et al., 2002; Tenhagen et al., 2004). The conception rate obtained in Ovsynch group in this study is 35.7% and this is in the ranges of the authors stated.
Less et al. (1992) stated that when randomly cyclic cows were subjected to the double 14 days prostaglandin protocol at least 67% of the cows had a corpus luteum at the time of treatment onset on day 7-20 of their estrous cycle which underwent luteolysis either spontaneously (cows on cycle day 18-20) or in response to PGF2α treatment (cows on cycle day 7-17). In the study, the rectal palpation prior to the second prostaglandin administration showed that all of the cows had mature CL in PG group. Murugavel et al. (2003) reported that reproductive performance in dairy cattle was also improved following double dose 14 days interval PGF2α treatment without assessing ovarian status compared with a single dose protocol based on detecting a corpus luteum by rectal palpation or by milk progesterone enzyme immunoassay.
The conception rates in the synchronization programmes with the PGF2α and the analogues varied between the ranges of 37-60% (Drillich et al., 2000). This variation is due to the the interval of prostaglandin administration and ovulation period depending on the development stage of the preovulatory follicle on the ovary (Mialot et al., 1999; Yaniz et al., 2004). Saumande and Humblot (2005) pointed out that the length of interval between the onset of estrous and ovulation may result in lower fertilization rates. Starbuck et al. (2006) declared that the interval from luteolysis to ovulation shows the greatest variability as 72 h. In this study the cows in the PG group was synchronized with an 14 days interval prostaglandin application. Additionally, GnRH was administered 48 h after the last prostaglandin application to minimize the variability between the luteolysis and the ovulation.
The conception rates following double dose 14 days interval PGF2α treatment was reported as 34% (Kurykin et al., 2006), 37.3% (Williams et al., 2002). Young (1989) obtained 51% conception rate after two artificial inseminations 72 and 96 h following the last prostaglandin administration in the study which the prostaglandin was applied 14 days apart. Although, one artificial insemination, the 47.6% conception rate in the PG group determined in the study was higher than the results obtained by the Tenhagen et al. (2000) and Kurykin et al. (2006) and similar to the results of Young (1989). This situation may be related to the GnRH application 48 h following the last prostaglandin administration. Cartmill et al. (2001) obtained a 27% conception rate in lactating cows in which the prostaglandin was applied twicely with an 12 days apart, GnRH administration 48 h after the last prostaglandin application and artificial insemination 16-20 h following the GnRH administration. Stevenson et al. (1999) obtained a 24.6% conception rate in lactating cows in which the prostaglandin was applied twicely with an 14 days apart GnRH administration 33 h after the last prostaglandin application and artificial insemination 16-18 h following the GnRH administration. The 47.6% conception rate obtained in PG group was higher than these results. Differences in conception rates could be due to the PG injection interval and GnRH administration time. Stevenson et al. (1999) reported that two injections of PGF2α given 14 days apart produced pregnancy rates equal to that produced by the Ovsynch protocol. In this study, the conception rates obtained in Ovsynch and PG groups were 35.7 and 47.6%, respectively. Altough, a rise is seen in the conception rate of PG group no statistical difference was achieved (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
The programme consisted of 14 days interval double dose PGF2α, injections, GnRH applications 48 h following the second PGF2α injection and timed artificial insemination 16-20 h after the GnRH injection may be an alternative to the Ovsynch programme in timed artificial insemination programmes.
Gokhan Dogruer, Mustafa Kemal Saribay, Fikret Karaca and Yasar Ergun. The Comparison of the Pregnancy Rates Obtained after the Ovsynch and Double Dose PGF2α + GnRH Applications in Lactating Dairy Cows.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/javaa.2010.809.813
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1680-5593/javaa.2010.809.813