Research Journal of Medical Sciences

178
Views

21
Downloads

Meta‐Analysis and Systematic Review: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) Vs Closed Reduction (CR), out of two which is more Favourable for Treating Mandibular Condylar Fracture

Drashti Doshi, Neha Vyas, Nitu Shah and Prashant Malik
Page: 8-15 | Received 15 Oct 2023, Published online: 01 Nov 2023

By Research Area

Medicine & Public Health Life Sciences Engineering Mathematics Biomedicine Physics Chemistry Computer Science Earth Sciences Social Sciences Business and Management Psychology Materials Science Economics Education Environment Philosophy Statistics Law Political Science and International Relations Pharmacy Dentistry Energy Linguistics Geography Finance Criminology and Criminal Justice Medicine Cultural and Media Studies History Architecture / Design Literature Biomedical Sciences Religious Studies Education & Language Food Science & Nutrition Public Health

By Volume and Issue

Abstract

Condylar fracture are most common fractures of mandible. But there exits a years old controversy of the treatment, either to treat it by open reduction internal fixation or by functional means i.e. closed reduction. Traditionally condylar fracture were treated by closed reduction, nowadays the trend is for open reduction and internal fixation. Both the treatment has its own merits and demerits. This meta‐analysis and systematic review compare the outcome of the condylar fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation and closed reduction in terms of maximum incisal opening, lateral excrusion, protrusion.

How to cite this article:

Drashti Doshi, Neha Vyas, Nitu Shah and Prashant Malik. Meta‐Analysis and Systematic Review: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) Vs Closed Reduction (CR), out of two which is more Favourable for Treating Mandibular Condylar Fracture.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.59218/makrjms.2024.2.8.15
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.59218/makrjms.2024.2.8.15