Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
Abstract
A gastric ulcer perforation is an emergency that has to be surgically treated right away. The prevalence of emergency surgeries is increasing despite the uncommon occurrence of planned surgery for duodenal ulcers. Using the basic randomization procedure, the patients were split into two groups of forty‐five each. Patients were divided into A and B groups. Mean operating time, intraoperative and postoperative mortality within 30 days, bile leak development, septicemia, intra‐abdominal abscess, wound infection, burst abdomen and lung complications, oral feeding starting on the day of surgery length of hospital stay were used to compare the results. There were 76 men and 14 women among the 90 patients. According to the data, 45 patients‐37 men and 8 women‐had undergone GO and 40 men and 5 women‐had received MGO procedure. The majority of the holes measured between 0.6 and 1 cm. In terms of morbidity and mortality, Graham's patch repair is just as effective as modified‐Graham's patch repair. For repairs, there is no statistically significant difference between the two procedures.
How to cite this article:
Eedara Sri Kousalya, P. Amutha and Renukadevi Vadivelu. A Comparison Between Graham’s Omentopexy and Modified‐Graham’s Omentopexy in Management of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.36478/makrjms.2024.1.513.516
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.36478/makrjms.2024.1.513.516