TY  - JOUR
T1  - Model of Leadership Relationship “Field Executive” to Motivation and
Improved Performance of Contractor Companypersonnel
AU - Irawan, Dafid AU - Mochtar, Indrasurya B. 
JO  - International Business Management
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
SP  - 238
EP  - 243
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2001/08/19
SN  - 1993-5250
DO  - ibm.2018.238.243
UR  - https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?doi=ibm.2018.238.243
KW  - Leadership
KW  -contractors
KW  -motivation
KW  -workforce performance
KW  -structural equation model
KW  -Blitar
AB  - Improving the workforce quality of foremans, skill labors and workers has an important role in
improving the quality of the building. In addition to bridging communication between site engineer and site
manager with workforce in the field, the field executives must have technical skills and managerial or leadership
skills in direct contact with the foreman, skilled workers and hired workers. From the organizational relationship,
the field execution must be able to apply the working drawings with the implementation method into the
building by optimizing the available resources. The leadership and communication methods being developed
must be fully understood to make no doubt the foreman, the skill labours and the workers in carrying out the
series of development activities. This study aims to obtain the factors that influence the relationships of the
leadership of field managers on motivation and performance improvement of workforce, i.e., foreman, skill labors
and workers in the contractor company and make the modeling. The research was conducted on the contractors
grade 5-7 in Malang, Surabaya, Blitar and Probolinggo. Data collection is obtained through questionnaires and
interviews. The Structural Equation Model (SEM) method is used to see the relationship among variables. Then,
the results are analyzed to model the relationship between leadership of field executive upon motivation and
improvement of workforce performance factors. The results show the leadership of the field manager affects
to the improvement of the workforce performance. While the work motivation has an effect on the workforce
performance. Whereas, the leadership affects to the work motivation. And the leadership has an indirect effect
on the improvement of workforce performance through motivation.
ER  -