TY  - JOUR
T1  - Identifying and Ranking the Requirements of Employee Performance Appraisal Effectiveness via a Comparison of Q Methodology Results with those of Friedman Method Case Study: SAIPA Company
AU - Boroujerdi, Fahimeh Kokabi AU - Baradaran, Siamak AU - Habibi, Masoumeh 
JO  - International Business Management
VL  - 10
IS  - 11
SP  - 2172
EP  - 2176
PY  - 2016
DA  - 2001/08/19
SN  - 1993-5250
DO  - ibm.2016.2172.2176
UR  - https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?doi=ibm.2016.2172.2176
KW  - Evaluation
KW  -performance appraisal
KW  -performance
KW  -Q methodology
KW  -reliability
AB  - The present study seeks to compare the results of examining the requirements of employee performance appraisal effectiveness in SAIPA Company using the two methods of Q methodology and Friedman Method. The process of implementing performance appraisal and common errors were described and the variables usefulness of feedbacks, fairness in evaluation, communications, elimination of rating errors and participation in the performance appraisal process were extracted from the perspective of experts of SAIPA Company (Delphi Method) as the requirements of employee performance appraisal effectiveness and were ranked, respectively using Friedman Method. This is an applied research in terms of purpose and a descriptive-survey research in terms of data collection method. Experts in SAIPA Company as well as some university professors were consulted for the face and content validity of the questionnaire and factor analysis method was used for its reliability in Q methodology.
ER  -