TY  - JOUR
T1  - Integrated Penal Law Enforcement to Intellectual Property Right in
Indonesia as a Response to USTR Releases Annual Special 301
Report on Intellectual Property Rights
AU - Widodo, Ismu Gunadi AU - Efendi, Jonaedi 
JO  - The Social Sciences
VL  - 13
IS  - 4
SP  - 836
EP  - 841
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2001/08/19
SN  - 1818-5800
DO  - sscience.2018.836.841
UR  - https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?doi=sscience.2018.836.841
KW  - Law enforcement
KW  -integrated penal
KW  -intellectual property right
KW  -stipulations
KW  -intellectual
KW  -Indonesia
AB  - In 2015, Indonesia is still regarded as one of the weakest countries in providing legal custody. It is
continuously featured. Based on the standpoint of USTR, it is mainly caused by the high rate of intellectual
property right, especially, CD-formatted songs, movies and software. As of software, Business Software
Alliance (BSA) report shows that software piracy rate in Indonesia stood at 88% with US$157 million potential
loss in 2013. This ranked Indonesia in the 4th position worldwide and the 3rd position in Asia Pacific of the
country with high piracy rate. Since, 1999 Indonesia has been among the top four countries with the highest
piracy rate. In response, Indonesia has passed new Intellectual Right Law (UUHC). The penal stipulations are
stated in 8 Articles of Law Chapter 12. It runs from 112-119. Article 120 confirms that complaint-filing principle
applies. It means that law only has its power when there is a report requesting to charge perpetrator by
disadvantaged party. It is obvious that the law has provided sound legal protection to inventor, intellectual
right holder and related-right holder. It resorts to a effective dispute resolution by means of mediation and
arbitrage. It contributes to some significant improvements of positive atmosphere for continuous inventions.
ER  - 