TY  - JOUR
T1  - How Did You Learn to Become an Expert in Strategic Thinking?
AU - Azizan, Norizan Haji AU - Othman, Siti Zubaidah AU - Isa, Mohd. Faizal Mohd. AU - Yusoff, Rushami Zien 
JO  - Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
VL  - 12
IS  - 6
SP  - 1448
EP  - 1457
PY  - 2017
DA  - 2001/08/19
SN  - 1816-949x
DO  - jeasci.2017.1448.1457
UR  - https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?doi=jeasci.2017.1448.1457
KW  - Qualitative
KW  -strategic thinking
KW  -adult learning
KW  -grounded theory
KW  -perceptions
AB  - Within the changing world of business, individuals are compelled to demonstrate their ability to think
strategically. Nevertheless, many are ill prepared and lack the skills to do so. Studies revealed that adults learn
in different modes and means to develop necessary competencies. Despite, the fact that much research revealed
adults learned from various learning methods and experiences, most of these studies were quantitative in nature.
Very few studies focused on how specific skills are developed from the respondent&#146;s own words. The general
aim of this study was to examine the most significant learning experiences which contributed to the proficiency
of strategic thinking amongst a group of senior managers. This qualitative, exploratory study addressed the
means as to how adults learned to develop their expertise in strategic thinking. Semi-structured interviews were
conducted amongst a group of 25 managers in Malaysia. Data collected were transcribed immediately after each
interview. Coding, analysing and writing were undertaken concurrently to identify major categories and themes.
Every category and occurrence were analysed and compared to find significant connections among them. These
led to the sorting of data into three general themes: formal and informal learning, individual factors and work
factors. These themes provided crucial insights into the significance of salient factors in influencing the
development of strategic thinking ability based on the participant&#146;s perceptions.
ER  - 