@article{MAKHILLIBM2016102526953,
    title = {Identify and Prioritize Entrepreneurship Development Policies of
Cooperation Sector with AHP Method},
    journal = {International Business Management},
    volume = {10},
    number = {25},
    pages = {5896-5903},
    year = {2016},
    issn = {1993-5250},
    doi = {ibm.2016.5896.5903},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1993-5250&doi=ibm.2016.5896.5903},
    author = {Moslem,Abdolmajid and},
    keywords = {Entrepreneurship,development of entrepreneurship,entrepreneurship policy,cooperation},
    abstract = {The purpose of this study, the identification of effective policies to promote entrepreneurship in the
cooperative sector and the classification of these factors Three main aspects of infrastructure and operational
consolidation and institutionalization of the determination and classification of every size and eventually
sub-classification index for each dimension. Current study considering the nature and purpose of applied
research is descriptive survey. The population of this research managers of cooperation office in Zahedan and
faculty members of the University of Sistan and Baluchestan, of which there are 25 people who received the
census. For this purpose, after theoretical studies, entrepreneurship development policy models were used. A
questionnaire was used to localize the model of the closed questions of the questionnaire was designed using
Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of the main factors and indicators of entrepreneurship development
policies were distributed among 30 that all of them were collected. After data collection and analysis software
with smart PLS, indicators that were selected coefficients higher operating loads, eventually prioritize
questionnaire with AHP method and the selected indexes were prepared and for the second time a total of 25
questionnaires were distributed to the 20 questionnaires were collected properly and Expert choice software
components and subcomponents priority data analysis and the results were presented. The validity of the
questionnaire with the professors and experts of cooperation office in Zahedan was appropriate. All of the
indicators inconsistency rate is less than 0.1. The results revealed that the infrastructure is weighing 0.413 in
first rank and operational dimensions with a weight of 0.327 is in the second rank and the institutional weight
of 0.260 is in third rank.}
    }