@article{MAKHILLTSS201914324781,
    title = {Towards the Understanding and Demarcation of Informal Settlements},
    journal = {The Social Sciences},
    volume = {14},
    number = {3},
    pages = {116-122},
    year = {2019},
    issn = {1818-5800},
    doi = {sscience.2019.116.122},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1818-5800&doi=sscience.2019.116.122},
    author = {Ighodaro and},
    keywords = {Informal settlements,slums,shacks not in a backyard,poverty,potentially capable,aspects},
    abstract = {In the literature there is currently a problem of definition and demarcation of informal settlements. The
goal of this communication is to suggest a best definition and demarcation for informal settlements. Through
a review of literature, the study suggests that when a study intends focusing on all characters of informal
settlements, including the overcrowding and extreme poverty aspects, the term ‘informal settlement’ or ‘informal
settlements and ‘slum’s may suffice. However, if basic characters are the focus, an operational definition should
be provided to avoid misunderstanding. Furthermore, the study suggests the proxy term ‘shacks not in a
backyard’, a term adopted by the Housing Development Agency of South Africa, even though not a perfect
one, is the closest criteria for the demarcation of informal settlements. This is believed to be potentially capable
of reducing the strain of demarcation especially useful for policy and developmental purposes.}
    }