@article{MAKHILLTSS201510722971,
    title = {Survey of Consensus Argument and its Relevant Viewpoints},
    journal = {The Social Sciences},
    volume = {10},
    number = {7},
    pages = {2014-2016},
    year = {2015},
    issn = {1818-5800},
    doi = {sscience.2015.2014.2016},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1818-5800&doi=sscience.2015.2014.2016},
    author = {Hosein and},
    keywords = {Non-textual,consensus technically,ulema,clergymen,juridical},
    abstract = {The consensus definition from Sunnite viewpoint is &#147;the consentaneous of Prophet Mohammad
nation&#146;s clergymen on a juridical order&#148; and from Shiah viewpoint is “the consentaneous of some Muslims that
they reveal the Imam&#146;s words. The consensus difference from Sunnite and Shiah viewpoint is that argument
criterion and consensus validity besides Shiah is detection from Imam but from Sunnite viewpoint, consensus
validity is through Islamic nation consentaneous. The most important ways of Imam&#146;s words detection from
consensus are sensational method (initiatory consensus) favoural method and sensational method. The
consensus divisions are as the acquired and narrated consensus a consensus that clergyman studies and
researches on the Ulema&#146;s opinions personally and it is called acquired consensus and that quoted acquired
consensus by others is called narrated consensus. The compound consensus whenever there were only two
opinions between the Ulema in a theorem it is concluded that they would negate third opinion with together
and it is called compound consensus technically. The difference between consensus and narration is that news
and narrations show Sunnah and we can impute to textual principles about them such as verbal principles and
literal principles but consensus is a non-textual reason and it should content with appointed quantity. After
survey the book and Sunnah we would study on the third reason namely consensus. In this direction, first
consensus definition is considered then consensus historic background is mentioned. After that consensus
argument is studied and finally consensus kinds are surveyed.}
    }