@article{MAKHILLTSS20127522354,
    title = {Comparison of the Punitive Damage with Compensatory, Symbolic, Indirect and Aggravated Damages},
    journal = {The Social Sciences},
    volume = {7},
    number = {5},
    pages = {701-703},
    year = {2012},
    issn = {1818-5800},
    doi = {sscience.2012.701.703},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1818-5800&doi=sscience.2012.701.703},
    author = {Ebrahim},
    keywords = {Punitive damage,compensatory damage,symbolic damage,indirect damage,aggravated damage,Iran},
    abstract = {The punitive damage is a kind of damage that should be compensated 
  by the defendant for his/her conduct in applying damage tinted with insolence 
  and malice to the plaintiff. The origin of this law institution was in common 
  law, especially in England which has been developed in other countries quickly. 
  Some conditions should be provided for demanding the punitive damage. The conduct 
  specified in the verdict of punitive damage is the behavior tinted with insolence 
  committed by the defendant; on the other hand, occurrence of loss is one of 
  the conditions required for demanding the compensation of punitive damage while 
  in other kinds of damages, the required conditions for claiming the indemnity 
  are different.}
    }