@article{MAKHILLRJMS201610412063,
    title = {Nursing and Midwifery Faculty Member’s Perceptions of Ethical Workplace Climate},
    journal = {Research Journal of Medical Sciences},
    volume = {10},
    number = {4},
    pages = {394-398},
    year = {2016},
    issn = {1815-9346},
    doi = {rjmsci.2016.394.398},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1815-9346&doi=rjmsci.2016.394.398},
    author = {Kianoush,Ehsan Rahmani,Fariba and},
    keywords = {Ethical workplace climate,faculty member,ethical,demonstrated,implement},
    abstract = {We examined nursing and midwifery faculty member’s perceptions of the ethical climate of their
workplace a cross-sectional survey of 110 nursing and midwifery faculty members in 3 universities of medical
sciences in Tehran with quota sampling method. Data collection was conducted through Victor and Cullen’s
Revised Ethical climate Questionnaire. The results revealed that perceived Ethical workplace climate in order
were egoism (M = 18.9, SD = 5.26), benevolence (M = 16.09, SD = 4.78) and principled (M = 19.33, SD = 4.73).
The prevailing ethical workplace climate on research environment was a “principled ethical workplace climate”.
There were no significant differences among faculty members regarding their gender and perceptions of ethical
workplace climate. The analysis demonstrated a foundation for higher education institutions to choose to
implement a particular ethical workplace climate to improved performance and organizational relations, increased
creativity and productivity. The study concluded with implications for future research.}
    }