@article{MAKHILLRJMS202519431867,
    title = {I‐GEL vs Baska Mask for General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ‐ A Comparative Study},
    journal = {Research Journal of Medical Sciences},
    volume = {19},
    number = {4},
    pages = {171-176},
    year = {2025},
    issn = {1815-9346},
    doi = {makrjms.2025.4.171.176},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1815-9346&doi=makrjms.2025.4.171.176},
    author = {A. and},
    keywords = {Baska Mask, cholecystectomy, general anesthesia, I‐Gel, supraglottic airway device},
    abstract = {Supraglottic airway devices (SGADs) are extensively utilised in modern
anaesthesia due to their simple insertion, minimum invasiveness, and
efficient airway management. The I‐Gel and Baska Mask are
second‐generation supraglottic airway devices that have improved seal
pressures and safety attributes, rendering them appropriate for
laparoscopic procedures necessitating positive pressure ventilation.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, marked by elevated airway pressures due
to pneumoperitoneum, necessitates a reliable airway seal. Evaluating
these devices enhances airway control strategies, hence improving
surgical safety and patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the
clinical performance of the I‐Gel versus the Baska Mask in patients
undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. A
prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted on 60 adult
patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under
general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two groups:
Group I (I‐Gel, n=30) and Group B (Baska Mask, n=30). Key parameters
such as ease of insertion, insertion time, oropharyngeal seal pressure
(OSP), peak airway pressure, incidence of gastric insufflation, and
postoperative complications (sore throat, cough, hoarseness) were
evaluated. Results were analysed using SPSS 20.0 version. The Baska
Mask demonstrated a significantly higher oropharyngeal seal pressure
compared to the I‐Gel (p<0.001), which was crucial for maintaining
ventilation in high airway pressure procedures like laparoscopy. Insertion
time was slightly longer for the Baska Mask, but not statistically
significant (p>0.05). Both devices had comparable success rates for
first‐attempt insertions. The incidence of postoperative sore throat was
slightly higher in the Baska group, though without statistical significance.
No major complications were reported in either group. Both the I‐Gel and
Baska Mask are effective and safe SGADs for laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. However, the Baska Mask provides a better
oropharyngeal seal, making it more suitable for procedures involving
elevated airway pressures. The choice of device should be guided by
patient characteristics, surgical needs, and anesthesiologist experience.}
    }