@article{MAKHILLRJAS201914910195,
    title = {Analysis Blatant Nature of the Relationship Between Intellectual Property and Intellectual
Authors of the Text with Effect},
    journal = {Research Journal of Applied Sciences},
    volume = {14},
    number = {9},
    pages = {282-285},
    year = {2019},
    issn = {1815-932x},
    doi = {rjasci.2019.282.285},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1815-932x&doi=rjasci.2019.282.285},
    author = {M. and},
    keywords = {Intellectual property,jurisprudence,the analysis of instances,the nature of intellectual property,recognize,self-react},
    abstract = {In this study, an example of intellectual
property and the nature of the relationship between
intellectual works is the originator of the work. Human
interests, the result of his work, the interest inherent,
innate and natural. Your man than what he has done and
considers their right to any other person the results of his
work, rated and preferred knows. The rights of a very
long time in different societies including Rome, Greece,
Europe and Muslim communities there have been. Of
course, much easier to form its present form. Today,
intellectual property rights, very varied and complex and
with the development of science and technology this law
also has expanded greatly and is considered the essentials
of human society. So, it is very important to recognize
these rights. Rights will have a tremendous impact. With
the arrival of issues related to intellectual property rights,
privacy and supply Iranian legal literature on
jurisprudence, scholars have been forced self-react. Some
have considered it incompatible with religious institutions
and intends to prove its claim raised by the evidence. In
contrast, the others have tried to make it consistent with
the law, show and follow it by mentioning different
reasons, needed to know.}
    }