@article{MAKHILLRJAS2013899332,
    title = {Judicial Approaches in Balancing Freedom of Speech and Contempt of Court in Malaysia},
    journal = {Research Journal of Applied Sciences},
    volume = {8},
    number = {9},
    pages = {456-460},
    year = {2013},
    issn = {1815-932x},
    doi = {rjasci.2013.456.460},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1815-932x&doi=rjasci.2013.456.460},
    author = {K.H. and},
    keywords = {Malaysia,freedom of speech,contempt of court,judiciary,Malaysian constitution},
    abstract = {Freedom of speech is guaranteed under Malaysian Constitution, 
  although such freedom is not absolutely un-curtailed. It is subject to certain 
  limitations such as on grounds of national security, public peace or morality. 
  One limitation of freedom of speech that is outside the limitations provided 
  in the constitution is contempt of court. Contempt of court is a power entrusted 
  to every court by statute or part of the inherent jurisdiction of the court. 
  This power extends to the courts hearing and even initiating contempt actions, 
  recognising forms of contempt, ensuring proper compliance with rules of procedure 
  applicable to contempt proceedings and if appropriate, punishing those who offend 
  these standards. These principles are contained in various statutes and even 
  more numerous cases. This study adopts a doctrinal method analysis on contempt 
  of court in Malaysia. It examines the judicial approaches adopted by Malaysian 
  courts in balancing freedom of speech and offences related to contempt of court.}
    }